into the azure deep

Or, Thoughts on Taking the “Plunge”


My favorite color is pretty much any shade of blue.
Blue is deep– as in deep, cool waters. Blue is the quenching of thirst.

In general, I’m pretty bad at identifying particular shades of blue, like the names of crayons (other than, say, “light blue” and “dark blue”). And I’m not sure that I could correctly identify exactly what “azure” looks like, unless I see it in the sky.

I know from literature an “azure sky” is one that is an especially deep, vibrant blue. Last year, while travelling with a group through Bosnia, we spent a day at a river that so reminded me of the sky, it would have to be called “azure” as well. The river was called the Neretva and it bisects the old turkish town of Mostar where we were staying for the weekend. The wikipedia entry for the Neretva river notes that it “has water of Class A purity and is almost certainly the coldest river water in the world, often as low as 7-8 degrees Celsius in the summer months.”

The most outstanding feature of the river at this point is the white stone bridge that crosses it some 85 feet above (an engineering marvel from the Ottoman Empire). This pedestrian-only bridge — the “Stari Most”– attracts a moderate number of tourists in the summer, who file slowly over the bridge’s arch as they meander through the old city. At the pinnacle of the arch, they stop and stare over the side at the churning blue below.

Approximately every 20 minutes, the crowds are treated to the spectacle of an old Mostar tradition– young men jumping from the bridge as a test of their manhood. At least, that was how the tradition started originally, though today it is done more to collect tips from tourists. A group of 4 or 5 local guys in speedos seemed to be working the bridge in rotation while we were there. One of them would stand up on the bridge’s edge for several minutes and make as though he were psyching himself up for the jump, while his accomplices would pass through the crowds with buckets for donations. When the buckets had been sufficiently filled (we estimated it took about 20 Euros), the jumper would take one step forward, and– after a long silence– dissappear into a little, white splash.

When we first heard of the bridge and the jumping tradition, I recall that my friend Greg and I were quite confident we could make the jump ourselves. However, after standing on the peak and watching the professionals, jumping appeared like death in 85 feet for us amateurs. You could feel your manhood withering at the sight. Similar to the sensation we later felt stepping into the icy water for a swim.

Though we were not willing to risk jumping from the Stari Most, we found a more reasonable opportunity to prove ourselves just a little downstream. Someone had constructed a metal diving platform on an outcropping of rocks, reaching in total to perhaps half the height of the bridge. We surmised that this was the practice platform where the locals trained before making the big jump.

Greg and I decided to go check it out. It took a little doing to find our way down to the platform– it could only be accessed from a little path behind a restaraunt on the street market. When we got there, we stripped down to swim trunks and decided that Greg would have the privilege of jumping first. With resolve, he took hold of the ladder and ascended the wobbly structure. I watched closely as he climbed, so that I could experience vicariously through Greg what I was about to go through. It was truly alot scarier than it had looked from the opposite side of the river, when we first spied the little outcropping. As Greg reached the top of the the platform, he was visibly in the grip of fear; my stomache dropped as well in sympathy.

He paced back and forth for about 15 minutes up on that platform. At one point, his feet even made the decision to make a run for the edge, but his hands resisted him, clutching the rails at the last moment and foiling the attempt. At last, he decided that for the first jump, he would jump from a lower rock ledge, rather than the full height. This would prove for certain whether the jump was safe to make; and this he did with no problem.

Then it was my turn. I made the long climb up the shaky structure, and I knew that by the time I reached the top step, I had committed myself to a loss. From this point there were only 2 ways down, each with its own loss– the way behind me, back down the steps, would require me to lose my dignity, and worse– my courage and sense of manhood. The way before me, into the azure deep, would require letting go of safety, the loss of the security of solid ground. At the time, the latter was definitely the hardest to give up on; irrationally, but deeply, I felt that the way ahead of me could be the loss of my life.

Because blue is baptism. Blue is death.

I walked out to the edge of the platform and back a number of times, for at least as long as Greg had stood up there. Each time that I got to the edge and looked down, I would visualize myself taking that next step, trying to build my courage. Somehow, I felt as if more was at stake than mere bragging rights at the dinner table that night. There was something symbolic, I knew it, something of almost spiritual significance represented by the blue beckoning in front of me. And though I didn’t know what exactly it was, I knew that I had to answer this calling well– whatever I might lose by letting go was not to be compared with what I would gain, or the ignominy of retreat.

At last, I did it. I cursed my fear, and ran forward, past the edge of the platform. At that instant my fate was decided… no amount of reconsidering or rethinking could bring me back to that platform and the safety of earth. Nor did I have time for any such thought to seize me. All I remember was the complete silence of the world in that moment, as I fell towards the river, as though falling into the sky.

In another instant there was a shock and then my senses were completely engulfed in the icy blue water.

Now it is a year later, and I am grateful that I made that plunge. Even moreso now as I consider that in three weeks, my world will change dramatically, as I take a plunge of a different kind. The plunge of marriage; and marriage, I’m told, is also baptism and death. I know this, and though I was once afraid, I no longer am. In the metaphor of the river, I have begun my sprint to the edge. A plane is waiting for me on Sunday, to take me over the blue, to the Beauty that waits for me. A Beauty that’s deep, as in deep, cool waters– the quenching of thirst.

supercalifragilistic dot com

The next time you’re looking for amish clothing on the internet, just remember…

www.modestapparelchristianclothing- lydiaofpurpledressescustomsewing.com

Yes, apparently even the amish are getting online. Which makes my mom officially the last person on earth NOT on the internet.

Protected: the big fly off!

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

movies to grow up in the 80’s by


Currently Watching
The NeverEnding Story
Yowser... it's Bowser!
The initials N.E.S. evoke two great memories from growing up in the 80’s.
1. Nintendo Entertainment System
2. The NeverEnding Story

I got NES-nostalgia last week– the second kind. It was sparked by David’s comment to me about how the infinity symbol may have come from two snakes trying to eat each other. So I did a little research on Google and found out a couple of interesting tidbits: the infinity symbol has a name — “lemniscate” — and the story about the snakes is neither entirely true nor entirely false. But getting to the point, the image of two snakes eating each other triggered a hallowed childhood memory: the “Auryn” from the NeverEnding Story.

The Auryn!!And then I started remembering just how great that movie was. …REALLY great. If you somehow missed this movie the first time around then I am truly sorry for you. You will never know how incredibly cool it is years later to still have the creatures of Fantasia running around in your head. Characters like–

Rock Biter

  • Atreju, boy-warrior and hunter of the purple Buffalo
  • The Rock Biter (with his incredibly HUGE, awesome stone motorcycle)
  • The Speed Snail (and that guy who flew on the back of a bat)
  • Falcor, the Luckdragon!!
  • The incredibly creepy (yet titillating) Southern Oracle
  • Morla– the giant, depressed turtle
  • The Child Empress of the Emerald City
  • Creepy StatuesYes, those of us who saw the movie will know that there is nothing quite so scary as nothing…THE Nothing to be precise. The only thing that comes close to that scary is walking between the topless Southern Oracle statues with the laser beam eyes, destroying anyone with self-doubt. Like Sebastian, we shouted “Run Atreju, Run!”– or at least we thought it very loudly.

    And unless you were the mean sort of kid who tortured cats and pulled bugs apart for fun, you cried when Artax fell victim to the Swamps of Sadness. You know you did. It may very well have been one of the saddest moments of your childhood (if you were incredibly sheltered). But then there were those happy moments– like when the Luckdragon came and saved the day. Or when you saw that Artax, and the Rock Biter and all our old friends of Fantasia were restored to life, the Nothing destroyed. Or when Falcor came into the real world… didn’t we all want to ride triumphantly on his back one time, and scare the holy heck out of the neighborhood bullies?Fight the Sadness, Artax!!

    Again, for the rest of you who didn’t see this movie as a child in the 80’s, I’m sorry. You could go rent the movie now, but it just won’t be the same. In fact, even if you did see the movie then, I don’t really recommend watching it as an adult… you will risk tarnishing the shine of some beautiful memories. And that is a risk simply not worth taking.

    I did watch the movie recently– in fact I bought it. And watching it as a semi-adult, I realize how much the Nothing has gotten to me. The effects seem dated and there is a hint of cheesiness in the air. The movie itself fails to quite recreate the magic aura it had in my imagination.

    Or, perhaps that is not a bad thing. Fantasia was, after all, a metaphor for the imagination. And the moral of NES was to never let the child-like imagination be destroyed by the great Nothing of the cynical “adult” mind. If Atreju, and the Rock Biter, and the Childlike Empress have found an enduring place in our imaginations, then The Neverending Story has itself become the very thing it allegorized. And for that reason, this movie is right at the top of my list of great-movies-to-grow-up-in-the-80’s-by.

    So, what would you put on that list? Go ahead. It’s open-mic night at the 80’s nostalgia-fest and the stage is yours…

    A New Found Glory (Neverending Story Theme)
    Turn around, look at what you see
    In her face, the mirror of your dreams
    Make believe I’m everywhere,
    Hidden in the lines
    Written on the pages is the answer to our Neverending Story

    Reach the stars, fly a fantasy
    Dream a dream, and what you see will be
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds
    and there upon the rainbow is the answer to our
    Neverending Story

    Show no fear, for she may fade away
    In your hand, the birth of a new day
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds
    and there upon the rainbow is the answer to our
    Neverending Story

    for us clanging symbols

    A very good article for young men who aspire to share their wisdom with the world in a blog.
    From a slightly older man with a blog.
    It has given me something to think about.

    http://www.ocularfusion.net/?p=150

    touching infinity: 2

    [Note: This post is the 2nd in a series. If you have not read part one, you should start there first. –> Part 1]



    What does infinity look like?

    That is the question we asked previously. A modern mathematician might smugly answer that it looks like this: infinity. We have a symbol to represent infinity on paper and we can even solve for it in our equations– equations that yield accurate, testable results. In fact, without utilizing infinity modern calculus would be quite impossible. It would appear that the mystery of infinity has been tamed by the mind of modern man.

    At least, that is what a jaded and unimaginative “expert” is likely to tell you… but don’t believe that for a second. The fact is, modern man has learned the mechanics of how to manipulate infinity to do math, but we are nowhere nearer to taming the mystery of infinity presented to us in nature. Sadly, the modern skeptic is prone to discount the mystery of anything that he can manipulate and test. As Varghese points out in The Wonder of the World, the skeptic has lost his natural sense of wonder at the universe and stopped asking the deeper, philosophical questions creation presents to us; he has contented himself with mere mechanical explanations and descriptions. Yet simply being able to predict a result does not indicate comprehension.

    Georg Cantor

    Georg Cantor is the 19th century German mathematician credited with giving us the modern definition for infinity. He devoted his academic career to set theory and the concept of the infinite, and suffered greatly for it, both in terms of his reputation and his mental health. His definition of infinity goes something like this: “a collection is infinite, if some of its parts are as big as the whole.” To the layman, this might sound rather uninspired, but it would be a mistake to lump Cantor in with the jaded skeptics. Cantor was someone who looked hard into the infinite and stood in awe of what he saw. He concluded that absolute infinity was both real and beyond the grasp of man and he equated the concept with God; thus he considered his theory of infinity to be as much a theological endeavor as mathematical one. Consider the following Cantor quotes:

    “I have never proceeded from any ‘Genus supremum’ of the actual infinite… What surpasses all that is finite and transfinite… is the single, completely individual unity in which everything is included, which includes the Absolute, incomprehensible to the human understanding. This is the Actus Purissimus, which by many is called God….”

    “I am so in favor of the actual infinite that instead of admitting that Nature abhors it, as is commonly said, I hold that Nature makes frequent use of it everywhere, in order to show more effectively the perfections of its Author.”

    I think it is noteworthy that after devoting his life’s work to the contemplation of infinity, Cantor describes it as “incomprehensible to the human understanding.” If this is the case, as we have suspected it was all along, then why exert any energy in trying to comprehend the “incomprehensible”? I think we have all asked that question at one point, and how we answered it determined whether we maintained that natural, child-like curiosity about the world around us– or whether we delegated that to the faceless experts and textbooks.

    It is essentially the same problem my buddy David was dealing with in the question he posed, “Can we know God?” I believe an equivalent question would be: “Can we count to infinity?” The answer to each of these questions depends on whether we ask it in light of the destination, or in light of the journey. Considered in light of the destination, the answer to both questions is positively “No”; that is, you could never, not with an infinite resource of time, say “I have arrived” — “I have counted to infinity”– “I know God fully.” However, viewed in light of the journey the answer is, “Yes! I can count towards infinity”– “I have the capacity for the knowledge of God”. Furthermore, we know that there is no limit imposed on us to hinder our progress in these endeavors or stop it prematurely; we can go on counting, and go on growing in the knowledge of God for an eternity. There is always more!

    Still, someone may ask, “What is the purpose of a journey whose end can never be reached?” To that, I would say that from the very beginning our attraction to the infinite lies in the fact that it’s end can not be reached. If the end could be reached and we could contain it fully, it would lose it’s power to inspire the soul. As such, it is there in the midst of our journey that we arrive at our true destination, which was not to comprehend the infinite, but to stand in awe of it. Selah.

    infinity

    “uh, this is awkward”

    I had a question today regarding etiquette. How long should I, as a man, hold the door for someone coming behind me?

    At my office we have a closed door in the middle of a long walkway. Whenever I come to the door I take a cursory check behind me to see if anyone else is coming… if they are, the accepted office etiquette seems to be that I should hold the door for that person and let them walk through first. That is all fine and well in general, but without further clarification of the rules, it can lead to some awkward moments.

    For instance, if the person is far enough behind me we seem to both understand that I should just go on ahead, as it would be silly for me to wait 30 seconds for them to get there. However, there is an in-between “Zone of Awkwardness” in which I find myself not knowing what to do– if I hold the door, I will be waiting anywhere from 6-10 seconds. If I simply go through, the slow-closing door will be just about to lock as the person gets there– which might seem rude.

    I’m in a quandry as to which is worse. Not only because holding the door unnaturally long is uncomfortable to me as the holder, I also find it uncomfortable when someone does the awkwardly long hold for me. I feel hurried and completely unhelped by the service; I am an able-bodied young man and opening the door for myself presents no hardship for me. I like opening doors!

    So if the rules of etiquette dictate a proper time to wait at the door, I’m pretty sure it would be different if the person behind me is male or female. It’s not that I think about this stuff very much– I just wish the rules were more clearly defined. In case you have encountered such awkard moments in office life, and in the hopes that we may bring some clarity to this confusion, I propose the following rules be observed:

    1. If you come to the door, and there is no one behind you, do not hold the door thinking someone may eventually come– simply walk through it. (This may be self-explanatory.)
    2. If you come to the door, and there is a non-disabled male less than 1-2 seconds behind you, hold the door.
    3. … if he is 3-4 seconds behind you and you make eye contact with him, you are obligated to hold the door.
    4. … if he is 3-4 seconds behind you and you do not make eye contact with him, or if he is more than 4 seconds away, do not hold the door.
    5. If a non-disabled woman is behind you, or if the non-disabled male is an acquaintance of yours, add 2 seconds to the times in 2,3, and 4. In the latter case, it helps to ask them about their weekend or something.
    6. If the non-disabled man is a boss, try to avoid scenario 3. If you can not, add 4 seconds.
    7. If the person behind you is mildly disabled or carrying or pushing something heavy, add 8 seconds to scenario 3 and 4 seconds to all others.
    8. If the person is seriously disabled, you should be ashamed for asking the question. Hold the door, for heaven’s sake!

    End post.

    And, oh, by the way…
    there is an encoded message in the previous post. There are enough clues within the post to decode it, I promise.

    Protected: …and XXIV reveals it.

    This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

    touching infinity: 1

    [Note: Here begins what was intended to be a meditative introduction to a series of posts dealing with the nature of infinity (and infinity in nature). Since the introduction itself grew to be too long I have broken it up into blog-sized bites for the convenient digestion of my readership (all 3 of you).]


    How big is the universe? What is beyond that?
    How small is the smallest particle? What is smaller than that?
    When did God begin?

    When I was a child, these were the questions that would boggle my mind and nag me until my head hurt. I had no reason then to doubt whether it was sensible, useful or practical to concern myself with such things. The impulse to know and to question was as natural and inborn as the impulse to catch crickets, dig in the mud and stare at the night sky. At the bottom of the questions was an unpretentious philosophical inquiry about the nature of the transcendent: What does infinity look like?

    It is the persistent question that causes the child-like mind to inquire after every destination and answer has been provided to it: And then what? It was both a fascination and a frustration to me that I could not wrap my mind around this concept of endlessness. Even knowing that the infinite is, by definition, uncontainable, I could not keep myself from the ever-futile attempt to contain it– or a piece of it– in my limited mind.

    I can remember quite vividly when I ran across the M.C. Escher drawing, Ascending and Descending, in one of my dad’s books. It absolutely fascinated me because it was a self-contained picture of the infinite– even if it was a bleak one. Follow the little hooded men one way around the staircase and you see that they are ever going up, yet never reaching the top. Follow them the other way around, and you see they are forever descending. And though the message here seems to be one of hopelessness, in some way I longed to insert myself into that picture and be a little hooded man on this magical staircase that captured infinity.

    Ascending and Descending-- M.C. Escher

    This Escher picture hangs in my room today, and I can still see myself in it. Sometimes as one of the men on the perpetual staircase, sometimes as the hooded observer on the lower rooftop– still looking towards the infinite and pondering its mysteries. It still causes me to wonder. I may have learned the textbook answers and I can now talk about the conundrums in the language of the college-educated; yet, I’m still as captivated by the basic questions of our universe as I was then. Annoyingly, persistently the answer to the basic question tantalizes and eludes me.

    What does infinity look like?

    In recent days, my thoughts on this topic have reached a level that at times has bordered on obsession. Many of my friends and family will attest to this, as I have subjected them to my wild theories on those occasions where they made the mistake of appearing interested, and even on occasions when they didn’t. It appears to me now that taking pen to paper, or finger to keyboard, is the best outlet available to me for this sort of thing. In the forthcoming posts on this topic, I promise to provide plenty of thought-provoking theories and bad science, for anyone willing to go there with me. Considering that I have met few who share my appetite for that sort of thing, it may be a lonely road– perhaps just the two of us. But I assure you I will be grateful for the company, and welcome you to chime in with your own objections, speculations and bad science.

    Just no Buzz Lightyear jokes, please. ;)

    (continue…)

    even in sheol…




    psalm139_b

    Originally uploaded by jdbush77.

    Psalm 139

    “…Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence?

    If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in hell, behold, You are there.

    If I take the wings of the morning, And dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea,

    Even there Your hand shall lead me, And Your right hand shall hold me.

    If I say, “Surely the darkness shall fall on me,” Even the night shall be light about me;

    Indeed, the darkness shall not hide from You, But the night shines as the day;

    The darkness and the light are both alike to You.

    For You formed my inward parts; You covered me in my mother’s womb…”

    click to continue reading



    Irv Davis painted this picture and the one currently at the top of my blog.

    Next Page »